HomeChannelsNewsDealsDirectoryDataEventsJobs
4Inbox4ActivityAsk
  • Home
  • Channels
  • News
  • 4Inbox
  • You
News
LatestBreakingDeep divesRegulatoryFunder spotlightsBroker storiesOpinionFintech
Formats
PodcastVideoReports
Subscribe
The Daily Line

Deep dives

4 min left
Deep dive·Pro— the long read

Top 10 MCA Funders by Volume: Q1 2026 Rankings — Exclusive Data & Analysis

Moneyline's exclusive quarterly funder rankings reveal major shifts at the top, with two newcomers breaking into the top 10 for the first time. Full methodology, volume data, and broker sentiment analysis inside.

ME
Moneyline Editorial
Senior Industry Analyst
September 5, 2026
10 min read · 6d ago
September 5, 2026 · 10 min read
Filed under rankings · funders · volume
  1. 1QuickFund Direct enters the top 5 for the first time, driven by same-day funding programs
  2. 2Forward Financing leaps from #12 to #7 on the strength of their AI underwriting engine
  3. 3Total top-10 combined volume reaches $2.8 billion in Q1 2026, up 18% year-over-year

The Q1 2026 Leaderboard Is Here

Moneyline's Q1 2026 funder rankings are in, and the results reflect a dynamic, rapidly evolving market. Our rankings are based on a proprietary methodology that combines self-reported funding volume, verified broker submission data, ISO partnership counts, and broker sentiment surveys from over 500 active Moneyline-verified brokers.

This quarter marks the first time we've incorporated real-time submission data from our Deal Box platform, providing a more accurate picture of actual market activity versus self-reported numbers alone.

Q1 2026 Top 10 Funders by Estimated Volume

RankFunderEst. Q1 VolumeChangeBroker Score
1Rapid Capital Funding$420M—8.7/10
2Pearl Capital Group$385M—8.4/10
3Libertas Funding$340M▲ 18.9/10
4Credibly$310M▼ 18.2/10
5QuickFund Direct$285M▲ 39.1/10
6Greenline Capital$260M—8.8/10
7Forward Financing$240M▲ 59.0/10
8Cloudfund$225M▼ 18.1/10
9National Funding$210M▼ 27.9/10
10Fox Business Funding$195MNEW8.5/10

Rankings based on Moneyline's composite scoring methodology. Volume figures are estimates based on multiple data sources. See methodology section below.

By the numbers
funded files in the sample
78K
loss multiple, stacked vs. clean
3.9×
default rate at 3+ positions
44.1%

The Biggest Story: QuickFund Direct's Rise

QuickFund Direct's leap into the top 5 is the headline story of Q1 2026. The New York-based funder has invested heavily in same-day funding capabilities, with 78% of approved deals funded within 24 hours — the fastest turnaround in the industry.

Their aggressive commission structure (10-14 points on funded deals) and dedicated broker support team have attracted a wave of ISO partnerships. CEO Jonathan Rivera told Moneyline: "Speed is the new currency in MCA. When a broker submits a deal at 9 AM and their client has funds by 3 PM, that broker remembers you. We've built our entire operation around that promise."

Forward Financing's AI-Powered Surge

The biggest mover this quarter is Forward Financing, which jumped five spots from #12 to #7. The catalyst: their new AI-powered underwriting engine, launched in Q4 2025, which has cut average approval times by 60% while simultaneously improving portfolio performance.

"We're seeing approval rates go up while default rates go down," said CEO Justin Bakes. "The models catch patterns that human underwriters miss — seasonal revenue cycles, industry-specific risk factors, early warning signals in bank statement data. Brokers want answers in hours, not days. We've rebuilt our entire stack to deliver on that promise."

“Stacking isn't a merchant problem. It's an information problem we've chosen not to solve.”
Chief credit officer, top-10 funder

Who Dropped Out — and Why

Two funders that held top-10 positions in Q4 2025 fell out of the rankings: Apex Business Capital (previously #9) and Summit Merchant Solutions (previously #10). Both faced headwinds from rising default rates in their portfolios, attributed to aggressive underwriting in the competitive Q3-Q4 2025 period.

Industry sources indicate both companies have tightened their approval criteria significantly, prioritizing portfolio quality over volume. "It's a natural correction," said one senior industry analyst. "When everyone is chasing A-paper, the winners are the ones who maintain discipline."

Methodology

Moneyline's funder rankings use a composite scoring system that weighs:

  • Estimated funding volume (40%) — Self-reported data, cross-referenced with ISO submission data and Deal Box activity
  • Broker sentiment score (25%) — Quarterly survey of 500+ verified brokers rating approval speed, offer consistency, communication, and commission reliability
  • ISO partnership growth (15%) — Net new ISO and broker relationships established in the quarter
  • Portfolio performance indicators (20%) — Default rates, renewal rates, and merchant satisfaction (where available)

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Moneyline verify funder volume data? We cross-reference self-reported numbers with ISO submission data, broker survey responses, and aggregated Deal Box submission patterns. Funders that decline to share data are estimated based on secondary sources.

What is the broker sentiment score? A quarterly survey of 500+ Moneyline-verified brokers who rate funders on approval speed, offer consistency, commission reliability, and communication quality on a 1-10 scale.

Can funders opt out of the rankings? Funders can decline to participate, but we will still include estimated data from secondary sources. Participating funders receive a "Verified" badge on their ranking.


Full detailed analysis, individual funder profiles, and downloadable data tables are available to Moneyline Pro subscribers. Rankings data collected January 1 – March 31, 2026.

Moneyline Pro

Keep reading with Moneyline Pro

This story is part of Pro coverage — the data desk, full deep dives and quarterly reports that 12,000 operators use to price, place and fund.

  • Every deep dive and data story
  • Quarterly & annual reports, with PDFs
  • Funder scorecards and rankings
  • The Daily Line, ad-free

$29/month after · cancel anytime

rankingsfundersvolumeQ1 2026MCA fundersindustry data
511 online now

Discuss in #news-desk

80 comments · 34 members weighing in

Open channel
ME
Moneyline EditorialStaff·2:00 PM

Q1 funder rankings are out. Methodology is volume-weighted by verified submissions — nobody paid for placement. Tell us what we got wrong.

MTSCJD+142 replies
JD
James DeLucaFunder·3:34 PM

The position-level default table is the most useful thing I've read this year. Printing it for our underwriting offsite.

RGCR14 repliesLast reply 4m ago
NP
Nicole PatelProvider·3:11 PM

Would love the same cut by industry. Restaurants skew every aggregate number in this space.

TRAK3 repliesLast reply 13m ago
MT
Mike TorinoFunder·2:48 PM

Bookmarked. This is exactly why I read Moneyline before I open email.

AMAdd to the conversation…↵
On this page
  1. The Q1 2026 Leaderboard Is Here
  2. Q1 2026 Top 10 Funders by Estimated Volume
  3. The Biggest Story: QuickFund Direct's Rise
  4. Forward Financing's AI-Powered Surge
  5. Who Dropped Out — and Why
  6. Methodology
  7. Frequently Asked Questions
Related
  • Deep dive
    Weekly Market Pulse: MCA Origination Volume Hits 18-Month High in February
    6h ago
  • Deep dive
    The Rise of Revenue-Based Financing in Healthcare: A $3B Opportunity
    1d ago
  • Deep dive
    Funder Rankings Q1 2026: Top 25 MCA Providers by Approval Rate
    2d ago

More in deep dives

See all
Deep dive

Weekly Market Pulse: MCA Origination Volume Hits 18-Month High in February

6h ago·7 min read
Deep dive·Pro

The Rise of Revenue-Based Financing in Healthcare: A $3B Opportunity

1d ago·5 min read
Deep dive

Funder Rankings Q1 2026: Top 25 MCA Providers by Approval Rate

2d ago·9 min read